Difference between revisions of "Photo Gallery"

From Billy Meier
Line 119: Line 119:
 
'''Q: Why doesn’t Billy Meier feature in the vast majority of UFO and mystery explained documentaries?'''<br>
 
'''Q: Why doesn’t Billy Meier feature in the vast majority of UFO and mystery explained documentaries?'''<br>
  
A: Netflix and major networks for example? Well it is a similar answer as above, it’s too loaded even if they had the time to explain their way around the hoax portrayal element, most audiences like a palatable entertainment arrangement which doesn’t challenge them and makes them feel comfortable, special and offers up an easy reward, doesn’t demand of them to think and is easy on the mind. The truth is also particularly difficult to sell and it would be difficult to fill out a documentary with sufficient conflict and action with the boring truth. A small quantity of documentaries have already been produced, some reasonably popular, but with the hoax element in there as an angle it additionally presents an intellectual challenge and risk for the producer because portraying something incorrectly tends to lead an organisation into more harm than it is worth to tell a story. A similar question would be why academic papers had not been written instead, well they have been written, it’s just that UFO’s is the kind of interest which tends to lead academics, professionals, e.g. pilots etc., to loose their jobs and alienate their teams, because large organisations don’t want to be seen to be having anything to do with it, for legal and commercial reasons. So a very limited variety of medias and at a very shallow depth cover it. Billy Meiers [[Books]] and [[Contact Reports]] are where the depth is, and most of it can’t be talked about easily in a conversation because most of it is new to conversation and covers very complicated subject arrangements and there is not much of an audience for it considering it requires many years to open up to all the different aspects of that. It’s not commercially viable.
+
A: Netflix and major networks for example? Well it is a similar answer as above, it’s too loaded even if they had the time to explain their way around the hoax portrayal element, most audiences like a palatable entertainment arrangement which doesn’t challenge them and makes them feel comfortable, special and offers up an easy reward, doesn’t demand of them to think and is easy on the mind. The truth is also particularly difficult to sell and it would be difficult to fill out a documentary with sufficient conflict and action with the boring truth. A small quantity of documentaries have already been produced, some reasonably popular, but with the hoax element in there as an angle it additionally presents an intellectual challenge and risk for the producer because portraying something incorrectly tends to lead an organisation into more harm than it is worth to tell a story. A similar question would be why academic papers had not been written instead, well they have been written, it’s just that UFO’s is the kind of interest which tends to lead academics, professionals, e.g. pilots etc., to loose their jobs and alienate their teams, because large organisations don’t want to be seen to be having anything to do with it, for legal and commercial reasons. So a very limited variety of medias and at a very shallow depth cover it. Billy Meiers [[Books]] and [[Contact Reports]] are where the depth is, and most of it can’t be talked about easily in a conversation because most of it is new to conversation and covers very complicated subject arrangements and there is not much of an audience for it considering it requires many years to open up to all the different aspects of that. The Netflix confession tapes documentary series about individuals who had been wrongly imprisoned presented evidence in a popular format which would be suitable. There has been great open loud noisy backlash against Billy and UFOs all over the internet generally unlike courtroom type narratives which tend to be private, professionally documented and easier stories to tell, it presents a risk to the television production company. It’s not commercially viable.
  
 
'''Q: Why have you put the rubbishy discrediting photos at the front of the collection and the high resolution images are buried in some obscure page somewhere?'''<br>
 
'''Q: Why have you put the rubbishy discrediting photos at the front of the collection and the high resolution images are buried in some obscure page somewhere?'''<br>

Revision as of 12:11, 25 September 2018

Please see Special:NewFiles or Special:ListFiles to view all uploaded files. There is also an Art Gallery.

Introduction

<img border="0" src="Photobuch_Front.jpg" alt="Photobuch" width="110" height="154" style="float:right"> <img border="0" src="photo-inventarium_vs.jpg" alt="Photo-Inventarium" width="110" height="154" style="float:right">

  • Photo-Inventarium / Photo-Inventarium
    Photographs by Billy Eduard Albert Meier and a selection of his witnesses from 17th May 1964 to 5th February 2004. With an explanation as to why BEAM is the proclaimer of the modern times, contact person to the Plejaren Federation, why he was supposed to take the best photos of the out of this world beamships and the reason they come to Earth.
    Source Sample
  • Photobuch / Photobook
    Linen cover with silver embossing, 4 coloured print, thread-bound, 122 pages, 95 photos (including 29 large format colour photos), size: 230mm x 297mm.
    Source Sample



In contrast to other UFO groups, which deal exclusively with the phenomenon of UFOs, for us the spiritual (geistige) and consciousness (bewusstseinsmässige) background occupies a much higher priority than all ufological concerns taken together.[1] Nevertheless, we cannot and don't want to renounce the topic of ufology, especially since we have the world's most extensive and best evidence that's ever existed. There is no UFO case on this Earth comparable to that of Billy Meier. The extraterrestrial human beings that Billy Meier has been selected and prepared to communicate with and be educated by, have encouraged and assisted him to take over a thousand photographs and film recordings of their many different types of spaceships, beamships, high-technologies and personnel, as well as various other interesting and supporting things. It’s a moderate, modest presentation considering what you’re looking at. [continue reading]


Photo's FAQ [Show/Hide]


Gallery



[click here to load many more images]

Further Reading

References

[show/hide]