Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 107"

From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension)
 
(Comment provided by Zameen - via ArticleComments extension)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 20:29, 30 September 2010 (BST)
 
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 20:29, 30 September 2010 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Zameen said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
And ofcourse they're going to give every excuse in the book. But on the other hand, what else could they do?
 +
 +
 +
--[[User:Zameen|Zameen]] 15:21, 1 October 2010 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 14:21, 1 October 2010

Comments on Contact Report 107 <comments />


Jamesm said ...

There is an interesting article in the New Scientist magazine about the Petrozavodsk UFO at http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Vb5Mz6DmutYC&lpg=PA897&ots=i4tqlfYAgF&dq=Petrozavodsk%201977%20ufo&pg=PA896#v=onepage&q=Petrozavodsk%201977%20ufo&f=false

--Jamesm 20:29, 30 September 2010 (BST)

Zameen said ...

And ofcourse they're going to give every excuse in the book. But on the other hand, what else could they do?


--Zameen 15:21, 1 October 2010 (BST)