Talk:Chapter 10 - SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Comments on Chapter 10 - SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY <comments />
dod said ...
Hawaiian said ...
I believe (correct me if not?) that a honorable man in the 1950's named Antoine Priore developed a machine called the Bordeaux Magnetic Machine. Basically it combines two or more high frequencies of longitudinal EM waves inside "pulsed" magnetic field carriers better known as "Scalar" waves to cure many cancerous cases both in animals and humans by the process known as quote.
"The mechanism is a dramatic extension to nonlinear optics, moving it to the "time domain", and resulting in the forced propagation of the pumped cellular mass itself-including the genetics- in the "time domain". Hence the damaged or diseased cellular mass is slowly reverted back to a previous earlier state. Quoted from the KeelyNet website, July 6 1990.
However, this technology was seized, weaponized and classified by the powers to be for evil purposes, which is called Scalar and further acknowledged by professor Tom Bearden, who also did an excellent line-for-line analysis comparing the perverted Christian bible to the Book of Talmud.
--Hawaiian 06:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Bigfoot said ...
Tungusta explosion destroyed 4000 technologically advanced and higher evolved human beings from another solar system.This means that there are now 4000 humans evolving here on earth that are higher evolved than most of the other 8-9 billion people.True or False?
--Bigfoot 07:15, 7 April 2010 (BST)
Hawaiian said ...
Bigfoot,
If you are referring to their spiritual evolved levels, then technically speaking, the answer to that is YES. But whether their current personalities being re-incarnated in Earth humans are at the moment contributing to this level remains in question for the following reasons:
Was it not evident that these advanced humans responsible for bringing the concept of religions/gods to their home world which resulted in war and destruction, being intervened by higher intelligences that forbade any more missions to Earth?
--Hawaiian 17:15, 7 April 2010 (BST)
Mrnorm said ...
Beamships of earth 65.52.58...Just dont see how this Brazillian group could ever learn are have the know how to fly a spaceship...these ET's were from a world that didnt breath our air... didnt look human Had a different language than this worlds peoples and didnt have there how to book with them... there fore information stored in there PC's... they could not get this information do to they didnt understand it even if they found it...Using reverce engineer...ing they would have technology that would be worth Trillions.................................Earth built U F O 's are nothing like a Beamship... and to me if you see a beamship and know its a beamship are a spaceship its not a U F O any longer but a I F O..are better yet a..I F S ...IDENTIFIED FLYING SPACESHIP...enought with unidentified flying nonsense
--Mrnorm 17:42, 15 September 2011 (BST)
Mrnorm said ...
I beleave that many many people that read all this information are put into a stuper... they dont know what to say are do... REAL are NOT REAL.. could it be... if it is real the goverment would do something... I HOPE NOT...But i will say that people that do read this ... TV and movie writers and producers ... i notice that there thinking has curved to the writings of all this information that is given out do to this site...thanks for that...
--Mrnorm 18:03, 15 September 2011 (BST)
Markvd said ...
Basicology before all else. You learn too much without the natural laws of creation mastered you are a walking destructive zombie. :)
--Markvd 06:05, 16 September 2011 (BST)
Chris H. said ...
The stated age of the Earth and Sun are different from Billy's contact notes. I remember reading that they are definitely older then 5 billion years, but much younger then 600-700 billion years old. Please confirm.
--Chrish64 04:27, 24 September 2011 (BST)
Chris H. said ...
The age of the Earth and Sun stated here do not match what Billy has said in the contacts. I know I read in the contacts that the Earth is older then 5 billion years old, but also much younger then 600 billion years. Same goes for the Sun. Please confirm.
--Chrish64 04:29, 24 September 2011 (BST)
Chris H. said ...
Please see: http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_228
137. With the two belts, which can also be designated as rings, this deals with the remnants of that gigantic primordial cloud of gas, particles and objects, and so forth, from which the solar system, with all its planets, ultimately formed more than 5,500,000,000 years ago. 138. But the cloud's primordial matter did not form at the aforementioned time, rather it already formed more than 46,000,000,000 years ago, and then, in the course of time, condensed into its final form, and supplied the substance for the solar system more than 5,500,000,000 years ago.
So you can see the the 600-700 billion number is off my a factor of 10.
--Chrish64 04:48, 24 September 2011 (BST)
Tcarch said ...
Queston. Do Asket`s people know about the shifts in time and the causes?
--Tcarch 06:27, 26 September 2011 (BST)
its really awesome
--dod 10:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)