Talk:Another investigation on the Asket photo controversy

From Billy Meier
Revision as of 18:01, 5 September 2010 by Bodhran (talk | contribs) (Comment provided by Bodhran - via ArticleComments extension)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Comments on Another investigation on the Asket photo controversy <comments />


Bodhran said ...

Hi that's a detailed analysis but I think you've missed some obvious points, there seems to be a clear difference in the jaw size in two pictures of the dean martin woman in figure 2 and figure 5, as these pictures are the same woman, any difference between the other pictures therefore can logically be attributed to angle of photography and facial expression,also the woman to the left In figure 4 is clearly standing close to the other woman next to her, wheras in figure 5 she is standing slightly in front and hence closer to the camera making her head appear larger. For whatever reason and by whomever, the pictures are clearly fake as has been stated by figu, this however does not detract from the hundreds of other thoroughly investigated and proven authentic pictures taken, except in the way it leads people to discuss hoax theories instead of focusing on the reality of the rest of the information. In my opinion, discussing these photographs and the few other obvious questionable example which have been stated as such by billy and figu is detrimental to the case as all you can say is that they are indeed tampered with or fake. Better I think to focus on what can be proven or even better on the message provided by the plejaran which is far more important than any picture.

--Bodhran 19:01, 5 September 2010 (BST)