Talk:Contact Report 001
Comments on Contact Report 001 <comments />
New German but automatic English back again.
Hello Zutt, thank you most kindly for adding the German text. I prefer the old translation (but there has been improvements) because it had been refined. The replacement in my opinion is an inferior DeepL autotranslate, which may even be hurtful to all those that helped refine those words. We may get a further opinion on it, and then we can migrate some of the old translation English back beside the German or what you have done may be left as it is now. Either way thank you for adding the German. There was numbers if I remember in the PPKB? Did you remove the numbers? No accusation, I may be mistaken that there are no numbers for this set, but do you know to keep the numbers in, why we have numbers? Do you know about dict.figu.org for word choices? And are you aware that DeepL puts American-English words in? Are you aware that DeepL mixes around the words which are in the German sentence, which is usually ok, but sometimes there are better English vocab words to use for German words and in a different order, e.g. unlearned is used again in the first few lines, to me it is impossible to learn to unlearn something it can only be learning. I only say all this because I don't know but I think you may be using DeepL indiscriminately, if that is an unfounded accusation I retract it. When I have added German to a Contact Report in the past this is why I have retained the English, and not retranslated, just so you know. If I am wrong I apologise but I may have said something here that you can take away with you which makes sense also. Thank you for the work you did Stephen Zutt.
Christopher said ...
Mark said ...
I was worried about that as well, they said that in the year 2000 ET's would arrive. I think maybe the AA and High Council thought Earth is not quite ready to handle such advanced beings yet. They would probably come laugh at our sorry excuse for a defense and annihilate us in less than 5 seconds. Since Earth is not fully united yet and many are quarreling over silly troubles still. I think the invasion was postponed or averted by the ????? Plejaren Federation or are these Barbarians still on there way, if so can we have a day and date and a plan to deflect there attacks.:) I always wondered why that ship that landed on Roswell came. I think it was a clue as how to find a way to counter beam ships. Let's find a scientific way without blowing ourselves up in the process to dent these suckers or cause any attacks on Earth lose there morale and send these folks packing.
--Mark 12:08, 13 July 2010 (BST)
John said ...
Mark,
Your comments are childish and distorted, first of all the Plejarens convinced the ET's who planned to make contact with Earth in the year 2000 not to proceed because the earthly leaders are lustful for their technology in order to gain more power and the populance are not ready to accept contact with higher beings.
Besides they are not aggressive, not like the other ET's that planned to invade and take over not just Earth, but other planets because their solar system was dying, but was evacuated by the Plejarens and their allies who found suitable unihabited planets for them.
Yet, you forgot to mention, that as long as Earthlings do not have the capacity to freely fly in outer space, the Plejarens are obligated to protect Earth from attack by other ET's, but not to intervene in culture or otherwise influence events on Earth.
--John 22:14, 13 July 2010 (BST)
newinitiation said ...
Samjase was also referring to the Giza intelligences, MIB from sirius, the renegades from beta centauri who aided the GI, ashtar sheran, wilo the wisp species and other ET group who've attempted assassination attempts on billy's life.
--newinitiation 17:55, 25 July 2010 (BST)
Mark said ...
Hi John, it is nice to meet a MATURE non comical being on the planet who is superior to all others. Are you a Plejaren? Where do you get your info. I would like to subscribe. :)
--Mark 21:26, 25 July 2010 (BST)
Milind Bokil said ...
Why do pelidians distant themselves with the word religion. I agree that most of our contemporary religions do not preach the truth. So, truly the people, with or without the help of a protagonist needs to amend these teachings and align to natural laws of creation. But what is the harm in using the word religion ?
--Milind Bokil 09:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Jamesm said ...
Hi Milind,
Religions are malevolent, erroneous doctrines that do great harm. See the page Religion.
On the other hand there is relegeon which is something else altogether and is useful. See this search result for more info on "relegeon".
--Jamesm 19:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Jamesm said ...
Perhaps one day the religions will be more "fixed" but it could be that it would be far easier to start again with the newly supplied truth as provided by the prophet of the new time, Eduard Albert Meier. See Goblet of Truth.
--Jamesm 19:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Allah. said ...
Sorry, I am just testing the integrity of my browser.
In Contact Report 001, Semjase tells Billy
32. Many faunal or even floral life forms have also reached highly advanced levels of existence. 33. So there are species that have acquired much knowledge and have freed themselves from their environment; they travel through space and also occasionally come to Earth. 34. Many of them are rather unpleasant creatures and live in a certain barbarism that frequently is nearly as bad as the terrestrials'. 35. One must be on one's guard from them because they often attack and destroy everything that gets in their way. 36. Often they have destroyed whole planets or forced their inhabitants into barbaric slavery. 37. This is one of our tasks: 38. To warn the people on Earth of these creatures. 39. Let the people know this because the time is approaching when a conflict with these degenerate human creatures becomes unavoidable.
Has any more information about these evil extraterrestrial humans been released? Is there information about them in Contact Reports that haven't yet been translated into English?
--Christopher 10:48, 13 July 2010 (BST)