Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 185"

From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Acriasis - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Acriasis - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 
--[[User:Acriasis|Acriasis]] 23:13, 29 August 2012 (BST)
 
--[[User:Acriasis|Acriasis]] 23:13, 29 August 2012 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Acriasis said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Your posting is good and we all learn from each other as well because we are in the same canoe trying to get to the same destination while others are paddling in the wrong direction leaves us in a dilemma. Should we continue on this non-evolutionary course or toss those who strive against development overboard so that they first learn how to swim before getting back in the canoe?
 +
 +
They could still decide against creational measures and refuse to paddle the canoe through their free will but their destination through swimming will be in vain, but none-the-less at least only their demise will be affected, not the whole crew in that canoe.
 +
 +
--[[User:Barbarian216|Hawaiian]] 20:44, 30 August 2012 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 19:44, 30 August 2012

Comments on Contact Report 185 <comments />


Acriasis said ...

If human beings would only reach out and take hold of the unconditional love that surrounds them, within theirselves each day, one may find that absolute knowledge can come to the one who seeks wisdom in truth. Each person, out of their own free-will, chooses a negative path each day, they are seperated from the eternal knowledge of Creation. Only by choosing a positive path to follow the laws and commandments given of Creation, is there an unconditional love that is felt, by experiencing life to its fullest, through the power within the indwelling of Creation within ourselves, that has always been there, but not recognized, because of the material lifes distractions of consciouseness which also occur daily. It would be good if these contacts would continue as they once were, but there are so many distracted people around, as well as time continueing to progress age and health, that it could only be acheived through public awareness of the existence of absolute truth, which would require an absolute transistion of the whole of an ignorant person of beliefs. Then even the falible ones would have no choice but to be submissive, with global awareness of absolute truth, which would dissolve the belief system indefinitely.

--Acriasis 04:28, 29 August 2012 (BST)

Hawaiian said ...

Creational attributes are logically designed to promote proper evolutionary results through its harmonic parameters of distance, time and dimensional differences amongst the various species that inhabit the universes. However there are some who do not adhere to creational standards and unfortunately inspire to circumvent this harmonic process and create all sorts of problems, not just for themselves but others as well because they have not learned to control their barbaric tendencies such as self ego destructiveness and the persecution of others who do not agree on their degenerative activities which continues to this very day including interferences from the future to promote their negative agendas.

It is through technology which is often abused to fulfill their degenerative activities upon those who are often powerless to resist such interferences because they lack the technology or understanding of the truth at hand and are often persecuted with threats and death from those in power to do so.

Therefore as was done in the past, it is not just the material Beings who are the ones to enforce the harmonic attributes of creational reality, but also those who are at the Arahat Athersata level who controls which spirit form incarnates or not and also those of the transitional stage between the material and non-material spiritual realms (High Council). Incarnated spirits that continue to exist at the expense of others and persecute those who strive to follow creational harmonic attributes should be separated as in the same principle of the separation of planets to ensure proper distance is maintained so that the evolutionary aspects of that particular planet is afforded the necessary environment to evolve on their own without interferences from other more advanced technological beings who intrude and cause a host of problems as witnessed by historical records of Earthly existence.

Both a parasitic spiritual incarnation and those that strive for harmonic endeavors cannot exist on the same planet and need to be separated in order for both to co-exist without endangering the other’s evolutionary development.


--Hawaiian 22:38, 29 August 2012 (BST)

Markvd said ...

Earth is like a mixture of all ingredients and no one separated the appetizer, main course, and dessert. Damn, we now have a mess of kitchen in terms of skill and efficiency. Everyone wants to be the head chef but only a few are true leaders. A lot of people want to lead but they are more of the enslave variety. I think those types should not be incarnated in order for Earth to at least have a slight chance at a well balanced menu. Rather than all ridiculous components which every human can't possibly accomplish to put together.

--Markvd 23:08, 29 August 2012 (BST)

Acriasis said ...

Thanks Hawaiian for the information, it was very informative. I shall need to do more research before posting my comments.

--Acriasis 23:13, 29 August 2012 (BST)

Acriasis said ...

Your posting is good and we all learn from each other as well because we are in the same canoe trying to get to the same destination while others are paddling in the wrong direction leaves us in a dilemma. Should we continue on this non-evolutionary course or toss those who strive against development overboard so that they first learn how to swim before getting back in the canoe?

They could still decide against creational measures and refuse to paddle the canoe through their free will but their destination through swimming will be in vain, but none-the-less at least only their demise will be affected, not the whole crew in that canoe.

--Hawaiian 20:44, 30 August 2012 (BST)