Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion"
From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Markvd|Markvd]] 14:28, 8 May 2011 (BST) | --[[User:Markvd|Markvd]] 14:28, 8 May 2011 (BST) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Jamesm said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | Mark I think the ozone hole will have recovered by 2065 but more precise information is available in this document: [[File:WMO-Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2006-20-Questions.pdf]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 15:36, 8 May 2011 (BST) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 14:36, 8 May 2011
Comments on Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion <comments />
Markvd said ...
Jamesm said ...
Mark I think the ozone hole will have recovered by 2065 but more precise information is available in this document: File:WMO-Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2006-20-Questions.pdf
--Jamesm 15:36, 8 May 2011 (BST)
..............no one go to the South Pole or else. :) Never planned to ever go there but my mind will also not even think of that possbility. I wonder how many holes we have and if we are in critical stage that is irreversible. HMMMMMMMMMMMMM
--Markvd 14:28, 8 May 2011 (BST)