Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 165"

From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Zameen - via ArticleComments extension)
 
(Comment provided by Neckel - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
--[[User:Zameen|Zameen]] 17:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Zameen|Zameen]] 17:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 +
</div>
 +
== Neckel said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Salome Zameen,
 +
 +
Nostradamus was genuine. However his prophecies and predictions are coated in a code which noone has deciphered so far. He had to do this or else he would have been with certainty condamned to beath by the church and mabe burned alive as sorcerer.
 +
It is unwise to interprete too much into his verses if one has not cracked the code because as it is said by Billy in this contact report, one could press his sentences in many happenings in history on earth. The fact that we really do regularly the same mistakes, makes the history repeat itself so often.......
 +
 +
--[[User:Neckel|Neckel]] 16:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 16:48, 2 November 2010

Comments on Contact Report 165 <comments />


Zameen said ...

I would like to know a lot more about this subject of Nostradamus and what Billy and the P's know of him. the end of this contact just leaves me on a cliff. does any one else know more about this?

--Zameen 17:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Neckel said ...

Salome Zameen,

Nostradamus was genuine. However his prophecies and predictions are coated in a code which noone has deciphered so far. He had to do this or else he would have been with certainty condamned to beath by the church and mabe burned alive as sorcerer. It is unwise to interprete too much into his verses if one has not cracked the code because as it is said by Billy in this contact report, one could press his sentences in many happenings in history on earth. The fact that we really do regularly the same mistakes, makes the history repeat itself so often.......

--Neckel 16:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)