Difference between revisions of "Talk:Another investigation on the Asket photo controversy"

From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Symmetry - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 16:46, 6 September 2010 (BST)
 
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 16:46, 6 September 2010 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Symmetry said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Billy could have send his original or similar camera to taken her pictures again. Sure someone could taken camera to and from Universes, and it will take short time to take a snap without complicated instructions. I don't think it would be a burden on their precious times on both sides.
 +
 +
--[[User:Symmetry|Symmetry]] 17:22, 6 September 2010 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 16:22, 6 September 2010

Comments on Another investigation on the Asket photo controversy <comments />


Bodhran said ...

Hi that's a detailed analysis but I think you've missed some obvious points, there seems to be a clear difference in the jaw size in two pictures of the dean martin woman in figure 2 and figure 5, as these pictures are the same woman, any difference between the other pictures therefore can logically be attributed to angle of photography and facial expression,also the woman to the left In figure 4 is clearly standing close to the other woman next to her, wheras in figure 5 she is standing slightly in front and hence closer to the camera making her head appear larger. For whatever reason and by whomever, the pictures are clearly fake as has been stated by figu, this however does not detract from the hundreds of other thoroughly investigated and proven authentic pictures taken, except in the way it leads people to discuss hoax theories instead of focusing on the reality of the rest of the information. In my opinion, discussing these photographs and the few other obvious questionable example which have been stated as such by billy and figu is detrimental to the case as all you can say is that they are indeed tampered with or fake. Better I think to focus on what can be proven or even better on the message provided by the plejaran which is far more important than any picture.

--Bodhran 19:01, 5 September 2010 (BST)

Markvd said ...

It is said the DAL universe was born at the same time as our DERN, thus being known as it's "TWIN". If I would venture to guess, that would or could possibly mean a whole alternate reality similar to ours in appearance but could be more advanced in other areas. :)Thus this could be a possible hoax with no ill intent to see and capture fraudulant ET's claiming to see truth or it could be there is an Asket. I remember a contact report stating that it was OK to allow Askets photo to be seen because it would not affect her or Nera being from the DAL universe. However there is another theory that could be possible, maybe they wanted to see the current maturity of those that control power in the media and "HOW" they would handle the situation? If that was the case, "EPIC FAIL" would be the conclusion.

--Markvd 19:14, 5 September 2010 (BST)

Alive said ...

"...will be banned until their next incarnation." Jezzzuz Chrrrist !

---- M -- 16:46, 6 September 2010 (BST)

Symmetry said ...

Billy could have send his original or similar camera to taken her pictures again. Sure someone could taken camera to and from Universes, and it will take short time to take a snap without complicated instructions. I don't think it would be a burden on their precious times on both sides.

--Symmetry 17:22, 6 September 2010 (BST)