Difference between revisions of "Talk:World War Three"
From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Bigfoot - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Mark - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Bigfoot|Bigfoot]] 23:08, 13 July 2010 (BST) | --[[User:Bigfoot|Bigfoot]] 23:08, 13 July 2010 (BST) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Mark said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | No thank you, we don't need any more silly battles to show our toughness. Crazed leaders shouldn't even be in power anyway and none of this would happen. Once a crazed leader is visible time to lower there capabilities to command military forces foolishly. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --Mark 00:56, 14 July 2010 (BST) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:56, 13 July 2010
Comments on World War Three <comments />
Bigfoot said ...
Mark said ...
No thank you, we don't need any more silly battles to show our toughness. Crazed leaders shouldn't even be in power anyway and none of this would happen. Once a crazed leader is visible time to lower there capabilities to command military forces foolishly.
--Mark 00:56, 14 July 2010 (BST)
Just as WW1 and WW2 did not destroy all Earth cities, WW3 would not destroy all cities. WW3 could miss San Francisco directly and happen before the predicted Great Earthquake.
--Bigfoot 23:08, 13 July 2010 (BST)