Difference between revisions of "Talk:How It All Began"

From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 
--[[User:Bigfoot|Bigfoot]] 06:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Bigfoot|Bigfoot]] 06:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
</div>
 +
== Alive said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Is ZOHAR the slang version of SOHAR ?
 +
 +
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 03:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 03:20, 27 February 2011

Comments on How It All Began <comments />


Bigfoot said ...

This totally makes sense to me.

--Bigfoot 05:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Alive said ...

This is not a teaching, but a confession of a man who lives to testify about the wonders of Creation. The wonders he has sensed since his childhood, but could only be communicated years later. Sensing came first and understanding later.

For me the most interesting parts of this confession are parts about contemplation:

- These conditions were the constant motivation for me to contemplate all those values and to develop myself in that direction, [...].

- Through this, I also learnt to separate the wheat from the chaff and to look for the truth where it is basically to be found, namely, in one’s own inner and innermost, as well as in one’s own intellect, in one’s own reason, one’s own thoughts, contemplations and feelings.


---- M -- 16:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Sheila said ...

Hi Alive, I'm pretty sure Billy understood it as he said it. The sensing and understanding came at the same time. He just couldn't find the words to express it.

--Sheila 17:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Alive said ...

Hi Sheila,

Thanks for your input. Please give me some trillions years to contemplate it, b----.

---- M -- 17:26, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Philip M. said ...

Well done. Beautiful to read.

--Philip 01:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Bigfoot said ...

Very simple to read and yet much treasure to find in it if you read it over again to see the invisible light. More treasure here than one would think at a glance...for your eyes only.

--Bigfoot 06:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Alive said ...

Is ZOHAR the slang version of SOHAR ?

---- M -- 03:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)