Difference between revisions of "Talk:Malona"
From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by TheUFOGuy - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
--[[User:TheUFOGuy|TheUFOGuy]] 04:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:TheUFOGuy|TheUFOGuy]] 04:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Jamesm said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | Like us. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 23:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
i had such a HARSH experience with some people because they couldn't reconcile that Meier and Amorah Quan Yin discuss the same events from slightly different perspectives. But they do. Meier and Quan Yin BOTH point out detailed perspectives about the ruined planet that is now asteroids -- Quan Yin points out that DOZENS of different star nations populated that planet. I bet they had as many different names for the planet as we have names for the different nations here on Earth.
But Meier points out that there were "planetary overlords" that manipulated the people into fighting against each other until said planet was destroyed...
all in all, both people are far beyond what limited science is taught in schools...scientific method that refuses to allow intuition is almost completely void -- but it is easily manipulated into stupid military-industrial complexes.
It leads me to think that eventually, intuitive people who can still handle rational thought will be involved in lifting humanity out of the general lack of humane behavior in global governance that has been the norm in previous centuries...
we've been given a great gift with the insight into the AEONS before our current state of development. i don't think humanity will squander it, although it does seem that we are being scared into awakeness.
--mikal 10:24, 12 May 2010 (BST)