Difference between revisions of "Contact Report 475"
From Billy Meier
(red meteor part) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| + | == Contact Report 475 Part 1 == | ||
| − | + | === Introduction === | |
| − | == Introduction == | ||
* Contact Reports volume: Unknown | * Contact Reports volume: Unknown | ||
* Page number(s): Unknown | * Page number(s): Unknown | ||
| − | * Date/time of contact: Wednesday, the 26th of November 2008 | + | * Date/time of contact: Wednesday, the 26th of November 2008, 2:16 PM |
* Translator(s): Reece Stiller | * Translator(s): Reece Stiller | ||
| + | * Official/unofficial translation: Unofficial | ||
| + | * Authorised/unauthorised by FIGU: Unauthorised | ||
* Date of original translation: Sunday, the 27th of September 2009 | * Date of original translation: Sunday, the 27th of September 2009 | ||
* Corrections and improvements made: Nicolas Weis | * Corrections and improvements made: Nicolas Weis | ||
| Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
Ptaah talks about why Plejaren names and terms must be pronounced the same as they are in the Plejaren language even when translated into the earthly languages. | Ptaah talks about why Plejaren names and terms must be pronounced the same as they are in the Plejaren language even when translated into the earthly languages. | ||
| − | '''This is | + | '''This is part 1 of the contact. This part is an unofficial and unauthorised translation and may contain errors.''' |
| + | |||
| + | === Contact Report 475 Part 1 Translation === | ||
{| | {| | ||
| Line 121: | Line 125: | ||
| Wird der Begriff falsch mit einem I am Ende ausgesprochen, eben ‹Plejari›, dann wird dem Wortteil ‹Jari› der Wert ‹Zerstörung› zugesetzt, folglich also aus dem Begriff der Unwert ‹Zerstörung der Siebenheit› entsteht. … | | Wird der Begriff falsch mit einem I am Ende ausgesprochen, eben ‹Plejari›, dann wird dem Wortteil ‹Jari› der Wert ‹Zerstörung› zugesetzt, folglich also aus dem Begriff der Unwert ‹Zerstörung der Siebenheit› entsteht. … | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Contact Report 475 Part 2 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Introduction === | ||
| + | * Contact Reports volume: Unknown | ||
| + | * Page number(s): 3486 | ||
| + | * Date/time of contact: Wednesday, the 26th of November 2008, 2:16 PM | ||
| + | * Translator(s): Unknown | ||
| + | * Official/unofficial translation: Unofficial | ||
| + | * Authorised/unauthorised by FIGU: Authorised | ||
| + | * Date of original translation: Unknown | ||
| + | * Corrections and improvements made: N/A | ||
| + | * Contact person: [[Ptaah]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Synopsis === | ||
| + | |||
| + | The danger of the [[Red Meteor]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''This is part 2 of the contact. This part is an unofficial but authorised translation.''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Contact Report 475 Part 2 Translation === | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Excerpt from page 3486 of the original notes) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Billy''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Regarding the Red Meteor that endangers Earth on the 13th of April, 2029 and of which we have already spoken on the 16th of September, I have been asked about certain things and, therefore, would like to know how big that bloke is. | ||
| + | |||
| + | To my knowledge the terrestrial astronomers have already detected it for quite some time and are calling it Aprophis or something. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It shall either hit Earth in the year 2029, or only whizzing by very closely. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should it be the latter case, it (the meteor) would reappear in the year 2036 and its close approach to Earth could really lead to a catastrophe if the scientists undertake nothing against it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Ptaah''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Its size is about 350 metres. | ||
| + | |||
| + | What you are saying regarding the great danger that the Red Meteor represents to Earth: the scientists know about it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | And if there will be no special influence by the outer SOL “trabants” (note by the translator: objects circling around and at great distance from our sun), a catastrophe really threatens the Earth. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In order to avoid it the terrestrial scientists are also urged to undertake every conceivable possibility to ultimately push the meteor from its orbit. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Billy''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | To my knowledge various models exist for this purpose, but the scientists cannot come to a mutual agreement on this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You are saying that the fellow shall be pushed from its orbit, and I gather from it that blowing it up is out of question. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Therefore, only a reaction principle could be applied, like e.g. an extremely strong nuclear reaction unit, sun sail principles, or atomic explosions near the meteor. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Ptaah''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Whereby atomic explosions near the meteor should be considered, because they are very efficient and produce a strong drift(ing) effect. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, the explosions may not occur too close to the meteor in order to avoid breaking it up, from which an even greater danger would result. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Such a project must be executed early and not at that time when the real danger is starting to threaten, because otherwise it would be too late for a success. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Therefore working towards it must be started today. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Billy''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | And what about big reaction units and sun sail principles? | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Ptaah''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Those are also possibilities, but they are much more difficult to carry out, and the necessary effectiveness is questionable; besides, with regard to their efficiency they are not to be recommended because meteors are unstable with regard to a regular self-position which makes the application of any effective reaction units and sun sails etc. nearly impossible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Billy''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Those things have to be profoundly thought about by the scientists. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Ptaah''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | That’s really so, but time presses. | ||
==Source== | ==Source== | ||
* [http://www.figu.org/ch/verein/periodika/sonder-bulletin/2009/nr-48 FIGU.org] | * [http://www.figu.org/ch/verein/periodika/sonder-bulletin/2009/nr-48 FIGU.org] | ||
| + | * [http://us.figu.org/portal/Knowledge/TheRedMeteor/tabid/151/Default.aspx us.FIGU.org] | ||
Revision as of 23:56, 13 October 2009
IMPORTANT NOTE
This is an unofficial and unauthorised translation of a FIGU publication.
This is an unofficial and unauthorised translation of a FIGU publication.
N.B. This translation contains errors due to the insurmountable language differences between German and English.
Before reading onward, please read this necessary prerequisite to understanding this document.
Before reading onward, please read this necessary prerequisite to understanding this document.
Contact Report 475 Part 1
Introduction
- Contact Reports volume: Unknown
- Page number(s): Unknown
- Date/time of contact: Wednesday, the 26th of November 2008, 2:16 PM
- Translator(s): Reece Stiller
- Official/unofficial translation: Unofficial
- Authorised/unauthorised by FIGU: Unauthorised
- Date of original translation: Sunday, the 27th of September 2009
- Corrections and improvements made: Nicolas Weis
- Contact person: Ptaah
Synopsis
Ptaah talks about why Plejaren names and terms must be pronounced the same as they are in the Plejaren language even when translated into the earthly languages.
This is part 1 of the contact. This part is an unofficial and unauthorised translation and may contain errors.
Contact Report 475 Part 1 Translation
| English | German |
| FIGU-SPECIAL-BULLETIN No. 48 | FIGU-SONDER-BULLETIN Nr. 48 |
| Importance to observe in relation to Plejaren names and terms | Wichtigkeit zur Beachtung in bezug auf plejarische Namen und Begriffe |
| (Excerpt from the 475th Contact Report of November 26, 2008) | (Auszug aus dem 475. Kontaktbericht vom 26. November 2008) |
| Billy | Billy |
| ... But one thing of which I already addressed twice in the recent past: | … Aber eine Sache, auf die ich in der letzten Zeit bereits zweimal angesprochen wurde: |
| How should it really be kept in relation to names of Plejaren persons and general Plejaren terms and names, etc.; you've once said that they are to be maintained and should not be changed if, for example, Contact Reports are translated into other languages? | Wie soll es denn nun wirklich gehalten werden in bezug auf die plejarischen Personennamen und allgemein auf plejarische Begriffe und Bezeichnungen usw.; du hast doch einmal gesagt, dass diese beibehalten und nicht verändert werden sollen, wenn z.B. Kontaktberichte in andere Sprachen übersetzt werden? |
| Ptaah | Ptaah |
| I indeed said that, because due to the importance of names and terms, it is imperative that they are written and pronounced in the same form as the Plejaren language. | Das sagte ich tatsächlich, denn für die Bedeutung der Namen und Begriffe ist es unbedingt notwendig, dass sie in der von uns gegebenen Form der plejarischen Sprache geschrieben und ausgesprochen werden müssen. |
| If this is not done, then completely false meanings form, that don't harmonize anymore with the proper meaning of the name or term. | Wird das nicht getan, dann entstehen völlig falsche Bedeutungsformen, die mit dem eigentlichen Wert des Namens oder Begriffes nicht mehr harmonieren. |
| Billy | Billy |
| So the names and terms should, respectively must sound the same as they are in your language in all earthly languages, as it is already the case with German and Swiss German, and the same applies if the names and terms are used in other languages such as English, French, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, Russian, etc. | Also sollen resp. müssen die Namen und Begriffe eurer Sprache in allen irdischen Sprachen immer gleich lauten, wie das auch in unseren deutschen und den schweizerdeutschen Sprachen der Fall ist, und zwar ganz gleich, ob die Namen und Begriffe in anderen Sprachen wie Englisch, Französisch, Spanisch, Italienisch, Japanisch, Russisch usw. benutzt werden. |
| If this is not done, then name and term distortions will arise. | Wird das nicht getan, dann entstehen Namens- und Begriffsverfälschungen. |
| Ptaah | Ptaah |
| This corresponds to the meaning of my words. | Das entspricht dem Sinn meiner Worte. |
| Only a single alteration of a single syllable respectively of a single letter creates an entirely different and as a rule, negative sense and unworth, for example the name of my daughter Semjase when the E at the end of her name in English is pronounced I. | Auch nur eine einzige Veränderung durch eine einzelne Silbe resp. durch einen einzelnen Buchstaben ergibt einen völlig anderen und in der Regel negativen Sinn und Unwert, wie z.B. beim Namen meiner Tochter Semjase, wenn das E am Ende des Namens in englischer Sprache als I ausgesprochen wird. |
| Semjase is a very old name that we Plejaren adopted from the Ancient Lyrian dialect, it means “The Demigoddess”. | Semjase ist ein sehr alter Name, den wir Plejaren aus einem altlyranischen Dialekt übernommen haben; er bedeutet ‹Die Halbgöttin›. |
| If the E at the end of her name, as I spoke of in the English language example is pronounced I, then there is a very bad misnomer. | Wird das E am Ende des Namens jedoch als I gesprochen, wie das z.B. in der englischen Sprache getan wird, dann ergibt sich daraus ein sehr böser Unwert. |
| “Sem”, from Semjase means in the Ancient Lyrian dialect “Half” while “Jase” means goddess, but “Jasi” means “Bane Goddess”. | ‹Sem›, gemäss Semjase, bedeutet im genannten altlyranischen Dialekt ‹Halb›, während ‹Jase› Göttin, ‹Jasi› jedoch ‹Fluchgöttin› bedeutet. |
| Hence, if in the English language the E at the end of Semjase is spoken as I, so therefore Semjasi, the name means “Demigoddess of Bane”. | Daraus ergibt sich, wenn in der englischen Sprache beim Namen Semjase das E am Ende mit I gesprochen wird, so also Semjasi, der Name ‹Halbgöttin des Fluches›. |
| Such false names and unworthy concepts respectively are unworthy of our languages and dialects, even if only a single letter in the word itself is wrong and is pronounced differently than the written form. | Solche falsche Namens- und Begriffsunwerte resp. Unwerte ergeben sich in unseren Sprachen und deren Dialekten auch, wenn auch nur ein einzelner Buchstabe im Wort selbst falsch und also anders ausgesprochen wird, als dieser in der geschriebenen Form gegeben ist. |
| Billy | Billy |
| Then it is the same in the German language, that every name and every term only is in rightness and has its real value when it is read and spoken as it is written. | Dann ist es also gleich wie in der deutschen Sprache, dass jeder Name und jeder Begriff nur seine Richtigkeit und seinen wirklichen Wert hat, wenn er so gelesen und gesprochen wird, wie er auch geschrieben wird. |
| Even with name abbreviations the meanings can sometimes change into the negatives, such as in the worst case the name Andres or Andreas, if these are abbreviated as “Andi” which then means “Dirt Dog” respectively “Dirty Dog”. | Auch mit Namenskürzeln hat es ja seine Bewandtnis, dass sich die Bedeutung manchmal ins Negative verändert, wie z.B. im schlimmen Fall bei den Namen Andres oder Andreas, wenn diese mit ‹Andi› abgekürzt werden, was dann ‹Dreckhund› resp. ‹Dreckiger Hund› bedeutet. |
| Regarding the term “Plejaren” it is therefore my opinion that they must not be called anything other than just Plejaren. | Bezüglich dem Begriff ‹Plejaren› ist es folglich meines Erachtens ebenso, also Plejaren nicht anders genannt werden darf als eben nur Plejaren. |
| Ptaah | Ptaah |
| What you say corresponds to rightness, and about the term Plejaren, it is the name of our system according to the very old dialect of the Ancient Lyrian language. | Was du sagst entspricht der Richtigkeit, und was den Begriff Plejaren betrifft, so wird unser System gemäss einem ebenfalls sehr alten Dialekt der altlyranischen Sprache genannt. |
| “Ple” means “Sevenfold“ and “Jaren” is equated with “Law”. | ‹Ple› bedeutet ‹Siebenheit› und ‹Jaren› ist gleichzusetzen mit ‹Gesetz›. |
| As inhabitants of this system, we are called Plejaren; however in relation to the individual the N at the end of the term changes or is omitted, so therefore a woman is a Plejara and a man is a Plejare. | Als Bewohner dieses Systems sind wir Plejaren; nur bezüglich der Einzelperson ändert sich das N am Ende des Begriff oder fällt weg, so also eine Frau eine Plejara und ein Mann ein Plejare ist. |
| The term Plejaren has the value “Law of the Sevenfold”, whereas “Jara” in the term “Plejara” means “Denzien” and thus “Denzien in the Sevenfold” and “Jare”, the second word in “Plejare” means “Dweller” and thus “Dweller in the Sevenfold”. | Der Begriff Plejaren hat den Wert ‹Gesetz der Siebenheit›, während bei der Bezeichnung ‹Plejara› das ‹Jara› soviel wie ‹Bewohnerin› und somit ‹Bewohnerin der Siebenheit› und bei ‹Plejare› der zweite Wortteil ‹Jare› also ‹Bewohner› und der ganze Begriff demgemäss ‹Bewohner der Siebenheit› bedeutet. |
| If the end of the term Plejare is pronounced as I, an unworthy meaning arises: “Destruction”. | Würde Plejare am Ende des Begriffs mit I ausgesprochen, würde das den Unwert ‹Zerstörung› ergeben. |
| Changes in the pronounciation of Plejaren and Plejare bring negative respectively unworthy results. | Änderungen in der Aussprache bringen auch beim Begriff Plejaren und Plejare Negatives resp. Unwerte hervor. |
| If the term is pronounced wrongly with I at the end, thus as “Plejari”, the part of the word “Jari” means “Destruction”, consequently the term becomes unworthy and means “Destruction of the Sevenfold”. ... | Wird der Begriff falsch mit einem I am Ende ausgesprochen, eben ‹Plejari›, dann wird dem Wortteil ‹Jari› der Wert ‹Zerstörung› zugesetzt, folglich also aus dem Begriff der Unwert ‹Zerstörung der Siebenheit› entsteht. … |
Contact Report 475 Part 2
Introduction
- Contact Reports volume: Unknown
- Page number(s): 3486
- Date/time of contact: Wednesday, the 26th of November 2008, 2:16 PM
- Translator(s): Unknown
- Official/unofficial translation: Unofficial
- Authorised/unauthorised by FIGU: Authorised
- Date of original translation: Unknown
- Corrections and improvements made: N/A
- Contact person: Ptaah
Synopsis
The danger of the Red Meteor.
This is part 2 of the contact. This part is an unofficial but authorised translation.
Contact Report 475 Part 2 Translation
(Excerpt from page 3486 of the original notes)
Billy
Regarding the Red Meteor that endangers Earth on the 13th of April, 2029 and of which we have already spoken on the 16th of September, I have been asked about certain things and, therefore, would like to know how big that bloke is.
To my knowledge the terrestrial astronomers have already detected it for quite some time and are calling it Aprophis or something.
It shall either hit Earth in the year 2029, or only whizzing by very closely.
Should it be the latter case, it (the meteor) would reappear in the year 2036 and its close approach to Earth could really lead to a catastrophe if the scientists undertake nothing against it.
Ptaah
Its size is about 350 metres.
What you are saying regarding the great danger that the Red Meteor represents to Earth: the scientists know about it.
And if there will be no special influence by the outer SOL “trabants” (note by the translator: objects circling around and at great distance from our sun), a catastrophe really threatens the Earth.
In order to avoid it the terrestrial scientists are also urged to undertake every conceivable possibility to ultimately push the meteor from its orbit.
Billy
To my knowledge various models exist for this purpose, but the scientists cannot come to a mutual agreement on this.
You are saying that the fellow shall be pushed from its orbit, and I gather from it that blowing it up is out of question.
Therefore, only a reaction principle could be applied, like e.g. an extremely strong nuclear reaction unit, sun sail principles, or atomic explosions near the meteor.
Ptaah
Whereby atomic explosions near the meteor should be considered, because they are very efficient and produce a strong drift(ing) effect.
However, the explosions may not occur too close to the meteor in order to avoid breaking it up, from which an even greater danger would result.
Such a project must be executed early and not at that time when the real danger is starting to threaten, because otherwise it would be too late for a success.
Therefore working towards it must be started today.
Billy
And what about big reaction units and sun sail principles?
Ptaah
Those are also possibilities, but they are much more difficult to carry out, and the necessary effectiveness is questionable; besides, with regard to their efficiency they are not to be recommended because meteors are unstable with regard to a regular self-position which makes the application of any effective reaction units and sun sails etc. nearly impossible.
Billy
Those things have to be profoundly thought about by the scientists.
Ptaah
That’s really so, but time presses.
