Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creation"
From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 22:25, 27 May 2012 (BST) | --[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 22:25, 27 May 2012 (BST) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Alive said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | I must admit that you are right, JamesM. I should revise my point: Batman is the Batman. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 22:45, 27 May 2012 (BST) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 21:45, 27 May 2012
Comments on Creation <comments />
Alive said ...
Jamesm said ...
I see your point but "Creation is Creation" was not mentioned in the article. "Creation is The Creation" means something useful, it implies that there is a uniqueness about it. Every Creation is unique? I've read that there are many Creations and the first one that created itself is the Absolute Absolutum. How it created itself such a long time ago, using the finest energy from the Absolute Nothing is something I cannot understand and probably won't for a few billion years.
--Jamesm 22:25, 27 May 2012 (BST)
Alive said ...
I must admit that you are right, JamesM. I should revise my point: Batman is the Batman.
---- M -- 22:45, 27 May 2012 (BST)
Saying that Creation is Creation is as fascinating as saying Batman is Batman.
---- M -- 17:30, 27 May 2012 (BST)