Difference between revisions of "Talk:How It All Began"

From Billy Meier
(Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Zameen - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 111: Line 111:
  
 
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 19:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 19:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 +
</div>
 +
== Zameen said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
It is a smile of hapiness. But since you posed your question in such a way in reference to what you need for your ego causes me to wonder if your being sincere or merely telling me you could careless about my thoughts which ofcourse is valid as well.......
 +
 +
--[[User:Zameen|Zameen]] 22:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 22:48, 2 March 2011

Comments on How It All Began <comments />


Bigfoot said ...

This totally makes sense to me.

--Bigfoot 05:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Alive said ...

This is not a teaching, but a confession of a man who lives to testify about the wonders of Creation. The wonders he has sensed since his childhood, but could only be communicated years later. Sensing came first and understanding later.

For me the most interesting parts of this confession are parts about contemplation:

- These conditions were the constant motivation for me to contemplate all those values and to develop myself in that direction, [...].

- Through this, I also learnt to separate the wheat from the chaff and to look for the truth where it is basically to be found, namely, in one’s own inner and innermost, as well as in one’s own intellect, in one’s own reason, one’s own thoughts, contemplations and feelings.


---- M -- 16:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Sheila said ...

Hi Alive, I'm pretty sure Billy understood it as he said it. The sensing and understanding came at the same time. He just couldn't find the words to express it.

--Sheila 17:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Alive said ...

Hi Sheila,

Thanks for your input. Please give me some trillions years to contemplate it, b----.

---- M -- 17:26, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Philip M. said ...

Well done. Beautiful to read.

--Philip 01:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Bigfoot said ...

Very simple to read and yet much treasure to find in it if you read it over again to see the invisible light. More treasure here than one would think at a glance...for your eyes only.

--Bigfoot 06:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Alive said ...

Is ZOHAR the slang version of SOHAR ?

---- M -- 03:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Zameen said ...

Alive does it ever stop with you?

--Zameen 04:56, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Alive said ...

Zameen,

What do you mean by "it" ?

---- M -- 13:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Zameen said ...

Alive. Hi.I was playfully referring to your penchant for silliness on some of your posts. I've cracked more than one smile. SALOME

--Zameen 15:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Still Alive said ...

Zameen,

Is that smile of happiness or sorrow? I really need to know, because it is crucial for the development of my Ego. I need to know if my sillines encouraged people to communicate or discouraged them. Please reply this message as soon as possible, so I could continue my daily life in peace and tranquilty.

---- M -- 17:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Sheila said ...

Hi Alive, unfortunately we don't have trillions of years to contemplate it. It's best to work on one lifetime at a time, starting with this. I'm sure you've already learned and grown since first posting on here, so already, you have a lot to look forward to. Keep your chin up! Peace brother.


--Sheila 16:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Alive said ...

Hi Sheila,

I do not know what exactly do you mean. I do not want to keep my chin up because that would open an opportunity to punch me and knock me off. Peace (cease of fire), sister Sheila.


---- M -- 19:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Zameen said ...

It is a smile of hapiness. But since you posed your question in such a way in reference to what you need for your ego causes me to wonder if your being sincere or merely telling me you could careless about my thoughts which ofcourse is valid as well.......

--Zameen 22:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)