Difference between revisions of "Fluidal Force"

From Billy Meier
(Created page with "The '''Fluidal Force''', Fluidal Power, Fluidal Energy, feinstoffsinnlich and commonly called supernatural ''(even though its all associated with the natural)''. Available and...")
 
(Blanked the page)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Fluidal Force''', Fluidal Power, Fluidal Energy, feinstoffsinnlich and commonly called supernatural ''(even though its all associated with the natural)''. Available and connected information, its place within the respective fields of non-coarse material science, fine-material science and the finest-material science, otherwise known as 'the science of [[creation]]' and 'spiritual sciences'. These interrelationships to the Human ie development of the respective mental (consciousness) capabilities, how to (go about) understand[ing] these (scientific) principles, why we have not discovered it and why it will take so long to understand, scientifically measure and subsequently develop a unique SI unit (International System of Units) with its own non-coarse, fine-material, sub-field science.
 
  
 
==FIGU related Books, Booklets and Forum section==
 
 
*[[Goblet of Truth]]
 
 
*[[Fluidal_Energy|About Fluidal Energy respectively, Fluidal Powers and Other Things]]
 
 
*[[Sixth And Seventh Senses]]
 
''The supernatural, feinstoffsinnlich or fluidal-powers [forces]''
 
 
*[[A Little Bit Of Knowledge, Sense And Wisdom]]
 
 
*[[The Psyche]]
 
 
*[[Wealth of the Non-Gewalt and Profound Spiritual Teaching Interpretations]]
 
 
*[[The Philosophy of Life]]
 
 
For full listing see [[Books]] and [[Booklets]] sections.
 
 
FIGU Forum:
 
 
[[http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/13/9242.html?1384954929 FIGU Forum section dedicated to Mental Fluidal energies, Fluidal forces]]
 
 
 
==Forces in the Contact reports==
 
 
During [[Contact_Report_544|contact 544]] dated 1st September 2012, [[Billy]] restrictively stipulates the following conversation with [[Ptaah]] regarding the seven major/fundamental powers/forces found in nature. A conversation which encompasses the 'Standard Model' (of particle physics) and something else related to 'immeasurable mystery suspended in immeasurable expanse', [[creation]] and creative natural laws.
 
 
<blockquote>
 
'''Billy:'''<br  />
 
<br  />
 
"When I was in the fourth grade of primary school, and my teacher was Hans Frei – it was in 1948 – your father, [[Sfath]], explained to me that altogether there are seven major powers of nature in the universe: on the one hand, the '''gravity''', then the '''electromagnetism''' as well as the '''strong''' and '''weak nuclear power''' [force], and further the …<br  />
 
<br  />
 
'''Ptaah:'''<br  />
 
<br  />
 
Stop. You are not permitted to openly name the other three, as indeed my father already told you. These three other powers of nature are not yet known of by terrestrial physicists, and they are still not allowed to discover them, because premature knowledge would have severe consequences.<br  />
 
<br  />
 
'''Billy:'''<br  />
 
<br  />
 
All right, excuse me, it remains withheld. It is certainly not in my interest to betray confided secrets, as I really only wanted to talk about the fact that there are not only the four natural powers known to the terrestrial physicists, rather also the remaining three which are still unknown to them, which exist as certain '''tiny''' and '''ultra-tiny particles''', as related to the gravity, the electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear power. Also the dark energy and '''dark matter''' are included in the realm of particles, whereby certain of these particles, which are indeed also energies with powers, are to be discovered in the foreseeable future, as you have said recently. Although it will still take a while, the success is to be understood – indeed according to your explanation – as a prediction."
 
<ref>[[Contact Report 544]]</ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
 
 
In [[FIGU_Bulletin_005#What_is_the_Universal_Material_Belt.3F|FIGU Bulletin 5]] the question '''"What is the Universal Material Belt?"''' is answered by [[Billy]]. An extract from the explanation:
 
 
<blockquote>
 
"Matter itself is in constant transformation within the Material Belt and it is, therefore, subject to growth and disintegration processes. For this reason, matter can never be or become as old as the Complete Universe. At any given time, therefore, only young matter can be found in the Material Universe; matter that can, at best, be a mere 40 or 45 billion years old -- in a solid and compact state -- while the age of the Complete Universe beyond the Material Belt, respectively our Material Universe, amounts to approximately 46 trillion years."<ref>[[FIGU_Bulletin_005#What_is_the_Universal_Material_Belt.3F|FIGU Bulletin 5]]</ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
 
 
During [[Contact_Report_224|contact 224]] dated 7th July 1988, [[Billy]] with [[Quetzal]] discusses the formation of [[Creation]]. Mentioning that there are 280 elements. The additional undiscovered elements are exclusively found in this sub-field of non-coarse material science.
 
 
<blockquote>
 
'''Billy:'''<br  />
 
<br  />
 
"...The Creation flakes, or rather the flakes that were created by the Creation and that formed in the empty space of the Universe, were hydrogen formations, in which all the building blocks or '''280 elements''' of life as well as all matter and gases, etc., which were already created by the Creation, were existent. These hydrogen formations or hydrogen flakes combined themselves over the course of time into larger masses and condensed themselves to such an extent that incredibly high temperatures arose within their interior and detonated the mass."<ref>[[Contact Report 224]]</ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
 
 
During [[Contact_Report_214|contact 214]] dated 3rd February 1987, [[Billy]] with [[Quetzal]] discusses the nature of chance, the law of causality and fate.
 
 
<blockquote>
 
'''Quetzal:'''<br  />
 
<br  />
 
"30. Unfortunately no, for this isn’t something that is based on a recognition of the future but solely on a stroke of fate, which is erroneously called “chance” by the Earth people, although there is no such thing in that sense, because chance is only given when, for example, something falls to a person, such as portion of a profit or, otherwise, a share of something.<br  />
 
<br  />
 
31. Only in this way can the term “chance” have its correctness, but not with respect to when something unexpected arises, which one wasn’t counting on and, therefore, which arises from the joining together of the given and complementary and interlocking relationships, and thus becomes a stroke of fate.<br  />
 
<br  />
 
'''Billy:'''<br  />
 
<br  />
 
You explained that well. In truth, things, situations, and events, as well as occurrences, etc., simply fit themselves together and join into one another in such a way that a particular effect emerges from this, freely according to the law of causality, that is, the law of cause and effect. This will result in certain effects that, in turn, arise from specific causes, as I just explained. So strokes of fate are nothing other than occurrences, events, incidents, and situations, etc. that result from a certain joining together, in order to act as specific causes. So for example, if it happens that two people meet unexpectedly somewhere in a foreign country, then it cannot and should not be designated as “chance” but rather solely as a stroke of fate, for the causes of this are given that both people traveled to the same country and are staying at the same place, where they will then meet. So the one joins itself to the other and the one to another, from which then emerges the result, respectively the effect, even the stroke of fate."<ref>[[Contact Report 214]]</ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
 
 
==Further Reading==
 
*[[Fluidal_Energy|About Fluidal Energy respectively, Fluidal Powers and Other Things]]
 
*[[Sixth And Seventh Senses]]
 
*[[A Little Bit Of Knowledge, Sense And Wisdom]]
 
*[[The Psyche]]
 
*[[Wealth of the Non-Gewalt and Profound Spiritual Teaching Interpretations]]
 
*[[The Philosophy of Life]]
 
*[[Goblet of Truth]]
 
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 

Revision as of 13:59, 19 February 2014